Pages

Monday, August 8, 2011

Inquest And Preliminary Investigation Rules 110 and 112 of the Revised Rules on Criminal Procedure

A.         Rule  110 – Prosecution of Offenses

        Section 1. Institution of criminal actions.– Criminal actions shall be instituted as follows:

(a) For offenses where a preliminary investigation is required pursuant to section 1 of Rule 112, by filing the complaint with the proper officer for the purpose of conducting the requisite preliminary investigation.

(b) For all other offenses, by filing the complaint or information directly with the Municipal Trial Courts and Municipal Circuit Trial Courts, or the complaint with the office of the prosecutor. In Manila and other chartered cities, the complaints shall be filed with the office of the prosecutor unless otherwise provided in their charters.

     The institution of the criminal action shall interrupt the running of the period of prescription of the offense charged unless otherwise provided in special laws.

    Sec. 2. The complaint or information – The complaint or information shall be in writing, in the name of the People of the Philippines and against all persons who appear to be responsible for the offense involved.
 
    Sec. 3. Complaint defined. – A complaint is a sworn written statement charging a person with an offense, subscribed by the offended party, any peace officer, or other public officer charged with the enforcement of the law violated.

    Sec. 4. Information defined. – An information is an accusation in writing charging a person with an offense, subscribed by the prosecutor and filed with the court.

    Sec. 5. Who must prosecute criminal actions. – All criminal actions commenced by a complaint or information shall be prosecuted under the direction and control of the prosecutor. However, in Municipal Trial Courts or Municipal Circuit Trial Courts when the prosecutor assigned thereto or to the case is not available, the offended party, any peace officer, or public officer charged with the enforcement of the law violated may prosecute the case. This authority shall cease upon actual intervention of the prosecutor or upon elevation of the case to the Regional Trial Court.(Read A.M. NO. 02-2-07-SC [Effective May 01, 2002] Latest Amendments to Section 5, Rule 110 of the Revised Rules of Criminal Procedure which provides:  "Section 5. Who must prosecute criminal action. - All criminal actions either commenced by complaint or by information shall be prosecuted under the direction and control of a public prosecutor. In case of heavy work schedule of the public prosecutor or in the event of lack of public prosecutors, the private prosecutor may be authorized in writing by the Chief of the Prosecution Office or the Regional State Prosecutor to prosecute the case subject to the approval of the court. Once so authorized to prosecute the criminal action, the private prosecutor shall continue to prosecute the case up to end of the trial even in the absence of a public prosecutor, unless the authority is revoked or otherwise withdrawn.  x x x .").
    The crimes of adultery and concubinage shall not be prosecuted except upon a complaint filed by the offended spouse. The offended party cannot institute criminal prosecution without including the guilty parties, if both are alive, nor, in any case, if the offended party has consented to the offense or pardoned the offenders.
    The offenses of seduction, abduction and acts of lasciviousness shall not be prosecuted upon a complaint filed by the offended party of her parents, grandparents or guardian, nor, in any case, if the offender has been expressly pardoned by any of them. If the offended party dies or becomes incapacitated before she can file the complaint, and she has no known parents, grandparents or guardian, the State shall initiate the criminal action in her behalf.chan robles virtual law library
    The offended party, even if a minor, has the right to initiate the prosecution of the offenses of seduction, abduction and acts of lasciviousness independently of her parents, grandparents, or guardian, unless she is incompetent or incapable of doing so. Where the offended party, who is a minor, fails to file the complaint, her parents, grandparents, or guardian may file the same. The right to file the action granted to parents, grandparents, or guardian shall be exclusive of all other persons and shall be exercised successively in the order herein provided, except as stated in the preceding paragraph.
    No criminal action for defamation which consists in the imputation of any of the offenses mentioned above shall be brought except at the instance of and upon complaint filed by the offended party.
    The prosecution for violation of special laws shall be governed by the provision thereof.

      Sec. 6. Sufficiency of complaint or information. – A complaint or information is sufficient if it states the name of the accused; the designation of the offense given by the statute; the acts or omissions complained of as constituting the offense; the name of the offended party; the approximate date of the commission of the offense; and the place where the offense was committed.
    When an offense is committed by more than one person, all of them shall be included in the complaint or information.
 
     Sec. 7. Name of the accused. – The complaint or information must state the name and surname of the accused or any appellation or nickname by which he has been or is known. If his name cannot be ascertained, he must be described under a fictitious name with a statement that his true name is unknown.
    If the true name of the accused is thereafter disclosed by him or appears in some other manner to the court, such true name shall be inserted in the complaint or information and record.

    Sec. 8. Designation of the offense. – The complaint or information shall state the designation of the offense given by the statute, aver the acts or omissions constituting the offense, and specify its qualifying and aggravating circumstances. If there is no designation of the offense, reference shall be made to the section or subsection of the statute punishing it.

    Sec. 9. Cause of the accusation. – The acts or omissions complained of as constituting the offense and the qualifying and aggravating circumstances must be stated in ordinary and concise language and not necessarily in the language used in the statute but in terms sufficient to enable a person of common understanding to know what offense is being charged as well as its qualifying and aggravating circumstance and for the court to pronounce judgment.

    Sec. 10. Place of commission of the offense. – The complaint or information is sufficient if it can be understood from its allegations that the offense was committed or some of its essential ingredients occurred at some place within the jurisdiction of the court, unless the particular place where it was committed constitutes an essential element of the offense charged or is necessary for its identification.

    Sec. 11. Date of commission of the offense. - It is not necessary to state in the complaint or information the precise date the offense was committed except when it is a material ingredient of the offense. The offense may be alleged to have been committed on a date as near as possible to the actual date of its commission.
 
    Sec. 12. Name of the offended party. – The complaint or information must state the name and surname of the person against whom or against whose property the offense was committed, or any appellation or nickname by which such person has been or is known. If there is no better way of identifying him, he must be described under a fictitious name.

(a)    In offenses against property, if the name of the offended party is unknown, the property must be described with such particularity as to properly identify the offense charged.

(b) If the true name of the person against whom or against whose property the offense was committed is thereafter disclosed or ascertained, the court must cause such true name to be inserted in the complaint or information and the record.

(c) If the offended party is a juridical person, it is sufficient to state its name, or any name or designation by which it is known or by which it may be identified, without need of averring that it is a juridical person or that it is organized in accordance with law.

    Sec. 13. Duplicity of the offense. – A complaint or information must charge only one offense, except when the law prescribes a single punishment for various offenses.
    Sec. 14. Amendment or substitution. – A complaint or information may be amended, in form or in substance, without leave of court and when it can be done without causing prejudice to the rights of the accused.
    However, any amendment before plea, which downgrades the nature of the offense charged in or excludes any accused from the complaint or information, can be made only upon motion by the prosecutor, with notice to the offended party and with leave of court. The court shall state its reasons in resolving the motion and copies of its order shall be furnished all parties, especially the offended party.
    If it appears at anytime before judgment that a mistake has been made in charging the proper offense, the court shall dismiss the original complaint or information upon the filing of a new one charging the proper offense in accordance with section 19, Rule 119, provided the accused shall not be placed in double jeopardy. The court may require the witnesses to give bail for their appearance at the trial.
 
    Sec. 15. Place where action is to be instituted. - (a) Subject to existing laws, the criminal action shall be instituted and tried in the court of the municipality or territory where the offense was committed or where any of its essential ingredients occurred.
    (b) Where an offense is committed in a train, aircraft, or other public or private vehicle in the course of its trip, the criminal action shall be instituted and tried in the court of any municipality or territory where such train, aircraft, or other vehicle passed during its trip, including the place of its departure and arrival.chan robles virtual law library
    (c) Where an offense is committed on board a vessel in the course of its voyage, the criminal action shall be instituted and tried in the court of the first port of entry or of any municipality or territory where the vessel passed during such voyage, subject to the generally accepted principles of international law.
    (d) Crimes committed outside the Philippines but punishable under Article 2 of the Revised Penal Code shall be cognizable by the court where the criminal action is first filed.

    Sec. 16. Intervention of the offended party in criminal action. – Where the civil action for recovery of civil liability is instituted in the criminal action pursuant to Rule 111, the offended party may intervene by counsel in the prosecution of the offense.

B.         Rule 112 – Preliminary Investigation
    Section 1. Preliminary investigation defined; when required. – Preliminary investigation is an inquiry or proceeding to determine whether there is sufficient ground to engender a well-founded belief that a crime has been committed and the respondent is probably guilty thereof, and should be held for trial.
    Except as provided in Section 7 of this Rule, a preliminary investigation is required to be conducted before the filing of a compliant or information for an offense where the penalty prescribed by law is at least four (4) years, two (2) months and one (1) day without regard to the fine.

    Sec. 2. Officers authorized to conduct preliminary investigations. – The following may conduct preliminary investigations:

(a) Provincial or City Prosecutors and their assistants;
(b) Judges of the Municipal Trial Courts and Municipal Circuit Trial Courts;
(c) National and Regional State Prosecutors; and
(d) Other officers as may be authorized by law.
    Their authority to conduct preliminary investigations shall include all crimes cognizable by the proper court in their respective territorial jurisdictions.
    Sec. 3. Procedure.– The preliminary investigation shall be conducted in the following manner:
    (a) The complaint shall state the address of the respondent and shall be accompanied by the affidavits of the complainant and his witnesses, as well as other supporting documents to establish probable cause. They shall be in such number of copies as there are respondents, plus two (2) copies for the official file. The affidavits shall be subscribed and sworn to before any prosecutor or government official authorized to administer oath, or, in their absence or unavailability, before a notary public, each of whom must certify that he personally examined the affiants and that he is satisfied that they voluntarily executed and understood their affidavits.
    (b) Within ten (10) days after the filing of the complaint, the investigating officer shall either dismiss it if he finds no ground to continue with the investigation, or issue a subpoena to the respondent attaching to it a copy of the complaint and its supporting affidavits and documents.
    The respondent shall have the right to examine the evidence submitted by the complainant which he may not have been furnished and to copy them at his expense. If the evidence is voluminous, the complainant may be required to specify those which he intends to present against the respondent, and these shall be made available for examination or copying by the respondent at his expense.
    Objects as evidence need not be furnished a party but shall be made available for examination, copying, or photographing at the expense of the requesting party.
    (c) Within ten (10) days from receipt of the subpoena with the complaint and supporting affidavits and documents, the respondent shall submit his counter-affidavit and that of his witnesses and other supporting documents relied upon for his defense. The counter-affidavits shall be subscribed and sworn to and certified as provided in paragraph (a) of this section, with copies thereof furnished by him to the complainant. The respondent shall not be allowed to file a motion to dismiss in lieu of a counter-affidavit.
    (d) If the respondent cannot be subpoenaed, or if subpoenaed, does not submit counter-affidavits within the ten (10) day period, the investigating office shall resolve the complaint based on the evidence presented by the complainant.
    (e) The investigating officer may set a hearing if there are facts and issues to be clarified from a party or a witness. The parties can be present at the hearing but without the right to examine or cross-examine. They may, however, submit to the investigating officer questions which may be asked to the party or witness concerned.
    The hearing shall be held within ten (10) days from submission of the counter-affidavits and other documents or from the expiration of the period for their submission. It shall be terminated within five (5) days.
    (f) Within ten (10) days after the investigation, the investigating officer shall determine whether or not there is sufficient ground to hold the respondent for trial.

    Sec. 4. Resolution of investigating prosecutor and its review. – If the investigating prosecutor finds cause to hold the respondent for trial, he shall prepare the resolution and information. He shall certify under oath in the information that he, or as shown by the record, an authorized officer, has personally examined the complainant and his witnesses; that there is reasonable ground to believe that a crime has been committed and that the accused is probably guilty thereof; that the accused was informed of the complaint and of the evidence submitted against him; and that he was given an opportunity to submit controverting evidence. Otherwise, he shall recommend the dismissal of the complaint.
    Within five (5) days from his resolution, he shall forward the record of the case to the provincial or city prosecutor or chief state prosecutor, or to the Ombudsman or his deputy in cases of offenses cognizable by the Sandiganbayan in the exercise of its original jurisdiction. They shall act on the resolution within ten (10) days from their receipt thereof and shall immediately inform the parties of such action.
    No complaint or information may be filed or dismissed by an investigating prosecutor without the prior written authority or approval of the provincial or city prosecutor or chief state prosecutor or the Ombudsman or his deputy.
    Where the investigating prosecutor recommends the dismissal of the complaint but his recommendation is disapproved by the provincial or city prosecutor or chief state prosecutor or the Ombudsman or his deputy on the ground that a probable cause exists, the latter may, by himself, file the information against the respondent, or direct another assistant prosecutor or state prosecutor to do so without conducting another preliminary investigation.
    If upon petition by a proper party under such rules as the Department of Justice may prescribe or motu propio, the Secretary of Justice reverses or modifies the resolution of the provincial or city prosecutor or chief state prosecutor, he shall direct the prosecutor concerned either to file the corresponding information without conducting anther preliminary investigation, or to dismiss or move for dismissal of the complaint or information with notice to the parties. The same rule shall apply in preliminary investigations conducted by the officers of the Office of the Ombudsman.

    Sec. 5. Resolution of investigating judge and its review.  – Within ten (10) days after the preliminary investigation, the investigating judge shall transmit the resolution of the case to the provincial or city prosecutor, or to the Ombudsman or his deputy in cases of offenses cognizable by the Sandiganbayan in the exercise of its original jurisdiction, for appropriate action. The resolution shall state the findings of facts and the law supporting his action, together with the record of the case which shall include: (a) the warrant, if the arrest is by virtue of a warrant; (b) the affidavits, counter-affidavits and other supporting evidence of the parties; (c) the undertaking or bail of the accused and the order for his release; (d) the transcripts of the proceedings during the preliminary investigation; and (e) the order of cancellation of his bail bond, if the resolution is for the dismissal of the complaint.

    Within thirty (30) days from receipt of the records, the provincial or city prosecutor, or the Ombudsman or his deputy, as the case may be, shall review the resolution of the investigating judge on the existence of probable cause. Their ruling shall expressly and clearly state the facts and the law on which it is based and the parties shall be furnished with copies thereof. They shall order the release of an accused who is detained if no probable cause is found against him.

    Sec. 6. When warrant of arrest may issue. – (a) By the Regional Trial Court. – Within ten (10) days from the filing of the complaint or information, the judge shall personally evaluate the resolution of the prosecutor and its supporting evidence. He may immediately dismiss the case if the evidence on record clearly fails to establish probable cause. If he finds probable cause, he shall issue a warrant of arrest, or a commitment order if the accused has already been arrested pursuant to a warrant issued by the judge who conducted the preliminary investigation or when the complaint or information was filed pursuant to section 7 of this Rule. In case of doubt on the existence of probable cause, the judge may order the prosecutor to present additional evidence within five (5) days from notice and the issue must be resolved by the court within thirty (30) days from the filing of the complaint of information.chan robles virtual law library
    (b) By the Municipal Trial Court. – When required pursuant to the second paragraph of section of this Rule, the preliminary investigation of cases falling under the original jurisdiction of the Metropolitan Trial Court, Municipal Trial Court in Cities, Municipal Trial Court, or Municipal Circuit Trial Court may be conducted by either the judge or the prosecutor. When conducted by the prosecutor, the procedure for the issuance of a warrant of arrest by the judge shall be governed by paragraph (a) of this section. When the investigation is conducted by the judge himself, he shall follow the procedure provided in section 3 of this Rule. If his findings and recommendations are affirmed by the provincial or city prosecutor, or by the Ombudsman or his deputy, and the corresponding information is filed, he shall issue a warrant of arrest. However, without waiting for the conclusion of the investigation, the judge may issue a warrant of arrest if he finds after an examination in writing and under oath of the complainant and his witnesses in the form of searching questions and answers, that a probable cause exists and that there is a necessity of placing the respondent under immediate custody in order not to frustrate the ends of justice.
    (c) When warrant of arrest not necessary. – A warrant of arrest shall not issue if the accused is already under detention pursuant to a warrant issued by the municipal trial court in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section, or if the complaint or information was filed pursuant to section 7 of this Rule or is for an offense penalized by fine only. The court shall them proceed in the exercise of its original jurisdiction.
 
    Sec. 7. When accused lawfully arrested without warrant. – When a person is lawfully arrested without a warrant involving an offense which requires a preliminary investigation, the complaint or information may be filed by a prosecutor without need of such investigation provided an inquest has been conducted in accordance with existing rules. In the absence or unavailability of an inquest prosecutor, the complaint may be filed by the offended party or a peace officer directly with the proper court on the basis of the affidavit of the offended party or arresting officer or person.
    Before the complaint or information is filed, the person arrested may ask for a preliminary investigation in accordance with this Rule, but he must sign a waiver of the provision of Article 125 of the Revised Penal Code, as amended, in the presence of his counsel. Notwithstanding the waiver, he may apply for bail and the investigation must be terminated within fifteen (15) days from its inception.
    After the filing of the complaint or information in court without a preliminary investigation, the accused may, within five (5) days from the time he learns of its filing, ask for a preliminary investigation with the same right to adduce evidence in his defense as provided in this Rule.

    Sec. 8. Records. – (a) Records supporting the information or complaint. – An information or complaint filed in court shall be supported by the affidavits and counter-affidavits of the parties and their witnesses, together with the other supporting evidence and the resolution on the case.
    (b) Record of preliminary investigation. – The record of the preliminary investigation, whether conducted by a judge or a prosecutor, shall not form part of the record of the case. However, the court, on its own initiative or on motion of any party, may order the production of the record or any of its part when necessary in the resolution of the case or any incident therein, or when it is to be introduced as an evidence in the case by the requesting party.

    Sec. 9. Cases not requiring a preliminary investigation nor covered by the Rule on Summary Procedure. – (a) If filed with the prosecutor. – If the complaint is filed directly with the prosecutor involving an offense punishable by imprisonment of less than four (4) years, two (2) months and one (1) day, the procedure outlined in section 3(a) of this Rule shall be observed. The prosecutor shall act on the complaint based on the affidavits and other supporting documents submitted by the complainant within ten (10) days from its filing.
    (b) If filed with the Municipal Trial Court. – If the complaint or information is filed with the Municipal Trial Court or Municipal Circuit Trial Court for an offense covered by this section, the procedure in section 3 (a) of this Rule shall be observed. If within ten (10) days after the filing of the complaint or information, the judge finds no probable cause after personally evaluating the evidence, or after personally examining in writing and under oath the complainant and his witnesses in the form of searching questions and answers, he shall dismiss the same. He may, however, require the submission of additional evidence, within ten (10) days from notice, to determine further the existence of probable cause. If the judge still finds no probable cause despite the additional evidence, he shall, within ten (10) days from its submission or expiration of said period, dismiss the case. When he finds probable cause, he shall issue a warrant of arrest, or a commitment order if the accused had already been arrested, and hold him for trial. However, if the judge is satisfied that there is no necessity for placing the accused under custody, he may issue summons instead of a warrant of arrest.

ARREST, SEARCHES AND SEIZURES




A.         Definition of Terms

1.          Arrest - Is the taking of a person into custody in order that he may be forthcoming to answer for the commission of an offense. (Sec. 1, Rule 113)

2.          Drug Enforcement Officer Arrest - is the act of taking an offender into custody and imposing restraint upon him with formal notification that he is “under arrest”.

3.          Drug Enforcement Officer Restraint – this is a method employed by the investigators to deprive the liberty of a person by taking him into custody, otherwise known as apprehension.  This is usually called as “detaining for questioning”, “protective custody’, and  “holding on a short affidavit”.

4.          Warrant of Arrest- A written order issued in the name of the People of the Philippines, signed by a judge directed to peace officer (to any law enforcement officer) commanding him to arrest the person named and described therein and bring him/her before the court.

a.          Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR)

b.         Art. 3. Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.

c.          Art. 9. No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.

d.         International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)

B.         Art. 9.

1.          Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person.  No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest or detention.  No one shall be deprived of his liberty except on such grounds and in accordance with such procedure as are established by law.

2.          Anyone who is arrested shall be informed of the reason for his arrest and shall be promptly informed of any charges against him.

3.          Conditions for making an arrest:

a.       Validly issued warrant of arrest or search warrant.

b.      Proper execution of the warrant of arrest or search warrant.

4.          Processes in the issuance of Warrant of Arrest.

a.       Essential Requisites of a valid warrant

b.         It must be issued upon probable cause;

c.          Probable cause must be determined personally by a judge;

d.         Such judge must examine under oath or affirmation the complainant and the witnesses he may produce; and

e.         The warrant must particularly describe the place to be search and the person or things to be seized.

Probable cause - means such facts and circumstances antecedent to the issuance of a warrant that are in themselves sufficient to induce a cautious man to rely upon them.

Probable cause for an arrest or for the issuance of warrant of arrest- would mean such fact and circumstances which would lead a reasonably discreet and prudent man to believe that an offense has been committed by the person sought to be arrested
Probable cause for search -would mean such facts and circumstances which would lead a reasonably discreet and prudent man to believe that an offense has been committed and that the object sought in connection with the offense are in the place to be search.
5.          Particularity of description

a.          When the description therein is as specific as the circumstances will allow;

b.         When a description expresses a conclusion of fact-not of law- by which the warrant officer may be guided in making the search and seizure;

c.          or when things described are limited to those which bears direct  relation to the offense which the warrant is being issued

6.          Procedure for effecting Arrest. An arrest is made by an actual restraint of a person to be arrested or by his submission to the custody of the person making the arrest.

          No violence or unnecessary force shall be used in making an arrest.  The person arrested shall not be subjected to a greater restraint than is necessary for his detention (Sec. 2, Rule 113) 
7.          Duty of arresting officer. It shall be the duty of the officer executing the warrant to arrest the accused and deliver him to the nearest police station or jail without unnecessary delay. (Sec. 3, Rule 113)     

8.          Execution of Warrant. The head of office to where the warrant or arrest was delivered for execution shall cause the warrant to be executed within ten (10) days from its receipt.  Within ten (10) days after the expiration of the period, the officer to whom it was assigned for execution shall make a report to the judge who issued the warrant. In case of his failure to execute the warrant, he shall state the reasons therefore.  (Sec. 4, Rule 113)

9.          Time of making arrest. An arrest may be made on any day and at any time of the day or night (Sec. 6, Rule 113)

10.      Methods of Arrest by officer by virtue of warrant - the officer shall inform the person to be arrested of the cause of the arrest and the fact that a warrant has been issued for his arrest, except when he flees or forcibly resist  before the officer has opportunity to so inform him, or when the giving of such information  will imperil the arrest.

The officer need not have the warrant in his possession at the time of the arrest but after the arrest, if the person arrested so requires, the warrant shall be shown to him as soon as practicable. (Sec. 7, Rule 113)
11.      Methods of arrest by officer without a warrant-   The officer shall inform the person to be arrested of his authority and the cause of the arrest, unless the latter is engaged in the commission of an offense, is pursued immediately after its commission, has escaped, flees, or forcibly resist before the officer has opportunity to so inform him or when the giving of such information will imperil the arrest (Sec. 8, Rule 113)

12.      Methods of arrest by private person-When making an arrest, a private person shall inform the person to be arrested of the intention to arrest him and the cause of the arrest, unless the latter is engaged in the commission of an offense, is pursued immediately after its commission or has escaped, flees or forcibly resist before the person making the arrest has the opportunity to so inform him or when the giving of such information will imperil the arrest. (Sec. 9, Rule 113)

13.      Right of officer to break into building or enclosure. An officer, in order to make an arrest either by virtue of a warrant, or without a warrant , may break into any building or enclosure where the person to be arrested is or is reasonably believe to be, if he is refused admittance thereto, after announcing his authority  and purpose. (Sec. 11, Rule 113)

14.      Right to break out from building or enclosure. Whenever an officer has entered the building or enclosure, he may breakout therefrom when necessary to liberate himself. (Sec. 12, Rule 113)

15.      Arrest without Warrant; when lawful- A peace officer or a private person may, without a warrant arrest a person:

a.          When, in his presence, the person to be arrested has committed, is actually committing, or is attempting to commit an offense;

b.         When an offense has just been committed and he has probable cause to believe based on personal knowledge of facts  or circumstances that the person to be arrested has committed it; and

c.          When the person to be arrested is a prisoner who has escaped from a penal establishment or place where he is serving final judgment or is temporarily confined while his case is pending, or has escaped while being transferred from one confinement to another. (Sec. 5, Rule 113)

C.         Laws Applicable to Search and Seizures.

1.          Sec. 1;    Rules 126 – Definition of Search Warrant

2.          Sec. 2;    Rules 126 – The personal property to be seized

3.          Sec. 3 ;   Rules 126 –  Requisites for issuing a search warrant

4.          Sec. 4;    Rules 126 – Examination of applicant for a search warrant

5.          Sec. 5;    Rules 126 –  Issuance and form of  search warrant
6.          Sec. 6;    Rules 126 – Right to break door or window to effect search

7.          Sec  7;    Rules 126 – Search of house, room, or premises to be made in    the presence of witnesses

8.          Sec.  8;    Rules 126 – Time of making search

9.          Sec.  9;    Rules 126 – Validity of search warrant (lifetime)

10.      Sec.  10;  Rules 126 – Receipt for the property seized

11.      Sec.  11;  Rules 126 – Delivery of property and inventory thereof to the   court

12.      Sec.  12; Rules 126 – Search without warrant of person arrested

a.          Search of a Person – is conducted to discover weapons or evidence to determine identity.

b.         Seizures – is the taking custody of property found by searching.

c.          Searches and Seizures- The power exercised by public authority to enter private premises for the purpose of arresting a person or of obtaining evidence of his guilt of a crime of which he is charged.  It may also be exercised to seize property which is subject to forfeiture.

d.         Search Warrant- is an order in writing issued in the name of the People of the Philippines, signed by a judge and directed to a peace officer, commanding him to search for personal property described therein and bring it before the court (Sec. 1, Rule 126)

D.         Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR). Art. 12. No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family home or correspondence, nor to attack upon his honor and reputation.  Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

E.          International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Art. 17.

1.          No one shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to unlawful attacks on his honor and reputation.

2.          Everyone has the right to protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

3.          Where application for search warrant shall be filed:

a.          Any court within whose territorial  jurisdiction a crime was committed

b.         For compelling reason stated in the application, Any court within the judicial region were the crime was committed if the place of the commission of the crime is known, or any court within the judicial region where the warrant shall be enforced.

If criminal action has already been filed, the application shall only be made in the court where the criminal action is pending. (Sec. 2, Rule 126)
4.          Personal Property to be seized

a.          Subject of the offense

b.         Stolen or embezzled and other proceeds, or fruits of the offense;
c.          Used or intended to be used as the means of committing an offense (Sec. 3, Rule 126)

5.          Requisites for issuing Search Warrant:

a.          Probable cause

b.         To be determined personally by a judge and not by the applicant or any other person

c.          The judge must personally examine in the form of searching questions and answers, in writing and under oath, the complainant and any witnesses he may produce, on facts known to them.

d.          The probable cause must be in connection with one specific offense;

e.          The warrant issued must particularly describe the place to be searched and the person or things to be seized; and

f.           The sworn statement together with the affidavits submitted by witnesses must be attached to the records.

6.          Right to break door or window to effect search. The officer, if refused admittance to the place of directed search after giving notice of his purpose and authority, may break open any out or inner door or window of a house or any part of a house or anything therein to execute the warrant or liberate himself or any person lawfully aiding him when unlawfully detained therein (Sec. 7, Rule 126)

a.          Search of house, room or premises - in the presence of the lawful occupant thereof or any member of his family/or two witnesses of sufficient age and discretion residing in the same locality (Sec. 8, Rule 126)

b.         Time of making search - The warrant must direct that it must be served in the day time, unless the affidavit asserts that the property is on the person or in the place ordered to be searched, in which case a direction may be inserted that it be served at any time of the day or night. (Sec. 9, Rule 126)

c.          Validity of Search Warrant - A search warrant shall be valid for ten (10) days from its date.  Thereafter, it shall be void. (Sec. 10, Rule 126)

7.          Receipt of the property seized:

a.          Must give a detailed receipt of property/ties to the lawful occupant of the premises in whose presence the search and seizure were made;

b.         or in the absence of such occupant, must, in the presence of at least two witnesses of sufficient age and discretion residing in the same locality, leave a receipt  in the place in which he found the seized property.  (Sec. 11, Rule 126).

8.          Delivery of the property and inventory to the Court/ Return/Proceeding:

a.          The officer must deliver the property seized to the judge who issued the warrant together with the inventory duly verified under oath.

b.         10 days after issuance of the warrant, the issuing judge shall ascertain if the return has been made. (Sec. 12, Rule 126)

9.          Search incidental to lawful arrest. A person lawfully arrested may be searched for dangerous weapons or any thing which may have been used or constitute proof in the commission of an offense without a search warrant. (Sec. 13, Rule 126)

10.      Search without a Warrant

a.          Search made incidental to a valid arrest

b.         Search of moving vehicle

c.          Search of goods concealed to avoid duties

d.         Seizure of evidence in plain view

e.         When there is waiver of the right

F.          Miranda Doctrine or Miranda Rule

1.          A doctrine or rule enunciated by the US Supreme Court in the case of Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966) where it laid down the constitutional requirements that must be observed in custodial investigation.

2.          The entirety of the Miranda Rule is now part of Philippine law

a.          The following are the constitutional requirements that must be observed in custodial investigation:

b.         The person in custody must be informed at the outset in clear and equivocal terms that he has the right to remain silent;

c.          After being so informed, he must be told that anything he says can and will be used against him in court;

d.         He must be clearly informed that he has the right to consult with a lawyer and to have a lawyer with him during the interrogation.  He does not have to ask for a lawyer.  The investigator should tell him that he has the right to counsel at that point;

e.         He should be warned that not only he has the right to consult with a lawyer but also that if he is indigent, a lawyer will be appointed to represent him.

f.           Even if the person consents to answer questions without the assistance of a counsel, the moment he ask for a lawyer at any point in the investigation, the investigation must cease until an attorney is present; and

g.          If the foregoing protections and warnings are not demonstrated during the trial to have been observed by the prosecution, no evidence obtained as a result of the interrogation can be used against him.
       
These rights are available after a person has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way.
Any person under investigation for the commission of an offense shall have the right to be informed of his right to remain silent and to have competent and independent counsel preferably of his own choice.  If the person cannot afford the services of a counsel, he must be provided with one.  These rights cannot be waived except in writing and in the presence of counsel. ( Article III, Sec. 12, par 1)